C&C Search Boutique Recruitment London, office jobs, c&c search jobs, boutique recruitment

Quiet Hiring

Back to Blogs

Quiet Hiring​

“Quiet Hiring is just the menacing reframing of the traditional practice of upskilling employees”.

This was the immediate reaction from one of the HR professionals and a sentiment which was swiftly agreed by many in attendance. It was in fact so widely agreed that it guided the conversation from what defines quiet hiring to how can we ensure the practice of up-skilling candidates is protected as a positive influence.

Is it important?

Quiet hiring, although initially perceived as a somewhat lazy term, has sparked essential discussions. The fact that it has become a widely debated topic underscores the negative associations with traditional upskilling methods in today’s market. Consequently, HR professionals must pinpoint areas of concern within existing norms and practices, guiding and advising managers while effectively communicating necessary changes. Recent roundtables consistently highlight the tension arising from heightened expectations among younger generations, especially post-pandemic. Demands for improved communication, transparency regarding policy shifts, career trajectories, and a redefined work-life balance have intensified. When the process of labor upskilling remains ‘quiet,’ it lacks communication about its implications for both the business and individual employees. Quiet hiring serves as a generational flashpoint, focusing attention on a specific HR domain.

With this, conversation naturally turned to the challenges all were facing in this battle, especially in guiding line managers and stakeholders in the wider business on why these issues are important. There was an acceptance from HR professionals that there needs to be a focus on educating hiring managers of the shifting expectations from new generations coming in, certainly since the pandemic. If these are the next generation of talent, then it is up to the current hiring managers to find an effective compromise. The ‘I did it back in my day’ saying is no longer greeted as a satisfactory justification for frustrations to their work. Reframing this relationship and communication is the key to ensuring the phenomenon now recognised as quiet hiring is reverted back to the upskilling of employees.

The principal variation in regard to quiet hiring was unsurprisingly around large, established organisations where there are strong graduate/apprenticeship plans and clear development plans which are demonstrated through clearly set out and time-stamped review processes. If employees, especially those at the beginning or early stages of their career, have clear guidelines and a number of demonstrable examples where getting those extra responsibilities or doing that specific training can propel you to the next level, they are far more likely to engage with it more positively.

What are the impacts?

Quiet hiring, in its most menacing form can deeply affect retention. The actions can occur gradually where there has been no acknowledgement of progression and extra responsibility through title, career trajectory or compensation. Additionally, a lack of training to support the additional responsibilities is often attributed to quiet hiring and can result in inadequate performance results. This will ultimately lead to burnout or a recognition from employees that they are currently being unfairly compensated (however that best fits their goals) and they look to leave for a job title, a support function, and salary they feel is more aligned. Certainly from an agency perspective, a lack of recognition or value from an employer is one of the top reasons employees look to leave and often don’t accept counter offers centred on compensation alone.

On the other hand, quiet hiring (or up-skilling) can be an exceptionally important part of retaining staff and ensuring the business remains productive and innovative. Effective and clear communication on career paths can reduce the demands from younger generations that is becoming more apparent. If they know, and can envisage the routes and time frames to promotions or personal growth, then they will be more willing to go the extra mile, work longer hours on occasion and have less frequent demands to be ‘rewarded’ unjustly in the eyes of current managers.

Effective quiet hiring is a really useful tool for organisations to restructure teams and to identify hiring and training needs in a more considered way. If you have had an open vacancy for a number of months and yet the productivity is not being harmed, perhaps rethinking the hire in the first place and identify who has been capable of carrying the extra responsibilities and having regular catch-ups to understand their motivations and goals.

Conclusion:

The conclusions of the event reflected the alternative perspective on quiet hiring. Quiet hiring as a concept is more of a negative branding of up-skilling current employees; where the adverse perspective is due to a lack of transparent and consistent communication around clear career paths, clarity and reflection on expectations and boundaries of the company and individuals. Thus, it is not the practice of upskilling existing employees and sharing out further responsibilities that holistically requires a new approach, but the communication and projection of long term outcomes for these actions that are a must change. There was an acceptance from attendees that it is HR’s role to advise and guide line managers to demonstrate more effective communication and transparency in the training process and that anecdotal justifications are no longer an accepted practice, particularly from younger generations.

C&C Search Boutique Recruitment.